Some random notes about issues to bring up in the final document.
Talk about representation vs. "features" (characteristics). Clarify "features", don't use indescriminitively (call them high-level features, topological features, as opposed to image features).
Two ways to go about finding "features":
i.e. looking for representations vs. characteristics
Bisque vs. Nonbisque? Unclear what the final application will be, but if Bisque is the goal, some discussion of it's feasibility is probably warranted. For example, interactive systems like the Clark paper might not be feasible for Bisque.
Kobus mentioned the different "dimensions" that the problem can be split into. Some might be
We can split the background reading into several areas, both in image processing/CV and biological application. Kobus recommended splitting time between these broad areas.
Image Processing Topics
Application Areas
Other topics that might be worth looking into, but maybe of speculative value.
We currently have data sets from a handful of different applications/domains.
Any questions for Martha?
Reading for next week: look into citations from Clark and Hypotrace
As we read, lets try to place each paper somewhere in the "Taxonomy" above.
Posted by Kyle Simek